Judicial Control Over Negative Administrative Decisions in the Saudi Legal System
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this study, we discuss the negative decision concept as legal characterization approved by Law for Administration's abstention or refusal to issue a decision, which is obligated give in accordance with laws and regulations. The study aims determine possibility of challenging its position re-coursing if Administrative Authority fails perform duty Circumvent manner that prejudices individuals’ interests. We have clarified every silence from Administration not decision. Rather, it required should be restricted upon refrain doing per requirements. Further, administrative embodied material form, issuance subject formal statutory rules established issuing explicit decisions. Therefore, does need announced effective facing individuals. It also characterized several characteristics distinguish other For example, may appealed an annulment suit after grievance fulfilling lawsuit conditions. addition, compensation could obtained through claim damage results failure duty.
 
 Received: 8 August 2022 / Accepted: 12 October Published: 5 November
منابع مشابه
Legal status of revolutionary institutions in Iran's administrative legal system
The revolutionary institutions, due to the authority of the public power, form an important part of the administrative organization in Iran. the legal status of the institutions in question was ambiguous, The legislator tried to create a legal personality by adopting the Public Accounts Act of 1366 and the Law on the List of Non-Governmental Organizations and Public Institutions approved in 137...
متن کاملEthics in the Legal System: A Fair Trial in Registered Quasi-Judicial Bodies
Background: A fair and just trial, as one of the most fundamental moral demands in the legal system, can have positive consequences in the legal system. The effectiveness of the registration system in society is increasing and it is necessary to conduct appropriate surveys to meet their expectations, especially in terms of paying attention to the substantive rules of fair trial. The rules and ...
متن کاملAdministrative Management, Administrative Regulation and the Judicial Process
In discussing problems connected with what is called public administration and administrative law, confusion not infrequently results from a failure to understand at the outset what is meant by the term "administration". A distinguished authority 1 has described administration as essentially the process of translating the general into the particular, and, as one phase of this process, the task ...
متن کاملArgumentation Mining from Judicial Decisions: The Attribution Problem and the Need for Legal Discourse Models
This paper discusses an attribution problem that is particularly critical for argumentation mining in judicial decisions, and the development of a legal discourse model as an important component of any solution to that problem. Attribution in this context is the problem of determining who believes a stated proposition to be true. This is a particularly difficult problem for developing natural l...
متن کاملExtraneous factors in judicial decisions.
Are judicial rulings based solely on laws and facts? Legal formalism holds that judges apply legal reasons to the facts of a case in a rational, mechanical, and deliberative manner. In contrast, legal realists argue that the rational application of legal reasons does not sufficiently explain the decisions of judges and that psychological, political, and social factors influence judicial rulings...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2281-3993', '2281-4612']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2022-0146